Wednesday, 31 December 2025
Tuesday, 30 December 2025
Grief
Jim Carrey once said: Grief is not just an emotion—it’s an unraveling, a space where something once lived but is now gone. It carves through you, leaving a hollow ache where love once resided.
In the beginning, it feels unbearable, like a wound that will never close. But over time, the raw edges begin to mend. The pain softens, but the imprint remains—a quiet reminder of what once was. The truth is, you never truly "move on." You move with it. The love you had does not disappear; it transforms. It lingers in the echoes of laughter, in the warmth of old memories, in the silent moments where you still reach for what is no longer there. And that’s okay.
Grief is not a burden to be hidden. It is not a weakness to be ashamed of. It is the deepest proof that love existed, that something beautiful once touched your life. So let yourself feel it. Let yourself mourn. Let yourself remember.
There is no timeline, no “right” way to grieve. Some days will be heavy, and some will feel lighter. Some moments will bring unexpected waves of sadness, while others will fill you with gratitude for the love you were lucky enough to experience.
Honor your grief, for it is sacred. It is a testament to the depth of your heart. And in time, through the pain, you will find healing—not because you have forgotten, but because you have learned how to carry both love and loss together
Dog Anatomy
Possibly from an original drawing by Margaret H Bonhman - Grooming for Dummies.
Really useful to be able to be accurate when discussing anything dog to know the exact parts - eg when telling vet about a problem.
Dogs and Rain
So next time your pup hesitates at the door, it might not be stubbornness — just those super ears doing their job.
So, what's the benefit of reading so many books?
I have read many books in my life, but I don't remember most of the information I gained from them. So, what's the benefit of reading so many books?
One day, a student asked his professor the same question. The professor remained silent and didn't answer that day. A few days later, the student and professor met by a river. The professor showed the student a pot with holes and said, "Let's go get water from the river with this pot." The pot broke on the ground. The student felt confused, thinking it was a useless task, as it was impossible to carry water with a pot full of holes.
However, he couldn't disobey his professor's advice, so he picked up the broken pot and ran towards the river. He filled the pot with water and brought it back, but he couldn't go far. A few steps later, the water leaked out of the holes and fell to the ground. He tried several times but failed and felt frustrated.
Afterward, he returned to his professor and said, "I failed. I couldn't bring water in this pot. It's impossible for me; please forgive me." The professor smiled sweetly and said, "You didn't fail. Look at the pot; it's clean now. It looks like a new pot. Whenever the water leaks out of the holes, the dirt inside the pot is washed away. The same thing happens to you. When you read a book, your mind is like the pot with holes, and the information in the book is like the water. When you read a book, you don't remember everything. But is it necessary to remember all the content? No, because reading books gives you ideas, knowledge, feelings, emotions, and truths that cleanse your mind.
Whenever you read a book, you undergo a spiritual transformation, and you are reborn as a new person. This is the main purpose of reading books."
Book [ad]: https://amzn.to/3Ycc4BG
Margaret Atwood
In 1982, she wrote seventeen words. Women recognized them instantly. Men had never thought about it before.
Margaret Atwood, already an acclaimed Canadian novelist, published an essay collection called "Second Words." Tucked among observations about literature, culture, and power was a single sentence that would become one of the most quoted lines in feminist discourse:
"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
Seventeen words that exposed a chasm between gendered experiences—a reality women had been navigating their entire lives but had never seen articulated so clearly.
For women who read it, the recognition was instant and visceral.
Because every woman reading those words had lived them.
Every woman had walked to her car with keys threaded between her fingers like makeshift weapons.
Every woman had smiled at a man she wanted to ignore because saying "I'm not interested" felt dangerous.
Every woman had texted a friend her location before a date. Just in case.
Every woman had calculated the risk of saying "no"—weighing whether politeness might keep her safer than honesty.
Atwood didn't invent this reality. She just named it out loud.
And once it was named, it couldn't be ignored.
The quote began appearing in feminist literature, in college classrooms, in conversations between mothers and daughters trying to explain why they taught girls to be careful, to be nice, to never directly reject a man who might become violent.
But it wasn't until the internet era that Atwood's observation truly exploded into cultural consciousness.
Social media gave it new life. Women shared it, tagged their friends, added their own stories:
"I gave a fake number because saying 'no thanks' felt risky."
"I said 'I have a boyfriend' instead of 'I'm not interested' because the first excuse is taken seriously and the second one isn't."
"I stayed at a party longer than I wanted because the guy who'd been hitting on me was waiting by the door."
The quote appeared on protest signs at women's marches. It was printed on t-shirts. It became shorthand for an entire dimension of gendered experience that had been invisible to half the population.
And many men read it and realized they had never thought about this before.
They had never considered that while they worried about embarrassment, women worried about survival.
That while they feared rejection, women feared violence.
That the same interaction—saying "I'm not interested"—carried completely different stakes depending on your gender.
Some men responded defensively: "Not all men are dangerous."
But that wasn't the point.
The point was that women can't know which men are dangerous, so they have to treat every situation as potentially threatening. It's not prejudice. It's the math of survival.
Here's what happens in many women's minds when approached by a stranger:
Is this person safe? Can I say no directly, or will that provoke him? Do I need an escape route? Should I lie about having a boyfriend because that's respected more than my own disinterest?
If you're a man who's approached a woman who seemed uncomfortable, you might have thought she was being rude or cold. You might have felt rejected.
But she was doing a calculation you've likely never had to do. She wasn't being rude. She was being careful.
Because rejection can be deadly.
The pattern is documented and horrifying:
April 2014: Maren Sanchez, 16, was stabbed to death in her Connecticut high school by a boy she'd turned down for prom.
May 2014: Elliot Rodger killed six people in Isla Vista, California, driven by rage toward women who had rejected him.
October 2014: Mary Spears was shot and killed outside a Detroit club after saying no to a man's advances.
These aren't isolated incidents. Research shows that approximately 40-50% of female homicide victims are killed by intimate partners or former partners. Women are far more likely to be killed by men they know than by strangers.
Rejection isn't just emotionally difficult for women. It's a calculated risk.
Margaret Atwood saw this in 1982—long before #MeToo, long before viral hashtags made patterns of violence impossible to ignore.
She saw it because women have always known it.
They knew it when they were taught to "let him down easy."
They knew it when they were told to smile at catcallers to avoid escalation.
They knew it when they learned that "I have a boyfriend" is taken more seriously than "I'm not interested"—because another man's claim is respected while their own autonomy is not.
Atwood's sentence did something powerful: it made the invisible visible. It took an experience women navigated daily—the constant low-level threat assessment—and put it into words that couldn't be dismissed.
The quote became a litmus test. How someone responded revealed how much they understood about gendered violence.
If you read it and thought "That's exactly right," you probably understood.
If you read it and thought "That's an exaggeration," you probably didn't.
Margaret Atwood has written over 20 books, won countless awards, and created "The Handmaid's Tale," one of the most influential dystopian novels ever written.
But for many people, this single sentence remains her most quoted work—not because it's her best writing, but because it's her truest.
It's the sentence women carry when they walk alone at night.
The sentence that explains why they share their location before dates.
The sentence that justifies caution that men sometimes mistake for coldness.
The sentence that says: We're not paranoid. We're realistic.
Forty-two years later, Atwood's words remain painfully relevant. Women are still being killed for saying no. The fear she named in 1982 is still the fear women live with today.
But something has changed: the conversation.
Atwood's words gave women a framework to talk about their experiences. They gave men a starting point for understanding something they'd never had to consider. They turned private fear into public discourse.
When a man worries about approaching someone, he's usually worried about embarrassment, rejection, feeling foolish.
When a woman worries about being approached, she's worried about assault, stalking, violence.
These are not equivalent fears. And pretending they are erases the very real danger women navigate daily.
Men fear humiliation. Women fear homicide.
Both are uncomfortable. Only one is deadly.
Margaret Atwood wrote seventeen words in 1982.
Women recognized them as truth immediately—because they'd been living it their entire lives.
And once you've read those words, you can't pretend you don't know anymore.
That half the population lives with a threat the other half never has to consider.
Atwood just said it out loud.
Book: #ad https://amzn.to/4pIjpFw
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)